Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.5 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-09-07 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.69 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.88 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Blush gold and Navy blue | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G is much better than the Motorola Moto G9 Plus, getting a 92.3 score against 80.5. Even though the Galaxy Z Flip 5G and Motorola Moto G9 Plus were released with only 1 months difference, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G is much thinner and lighter. Both of these phones include Android OS, but the Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a more recent 11 version and Motorola Moto G9 Plus has Android 10 version.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a slightly better looking screen than Moto G9 Plus, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little higher 1080 x 2636 resolution and a just a little greater display pixels density. Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a little faster processing unit than Motorola Moto G9 Plus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has 4 GB more RAM.
Moto G9 Plus has a little bit better storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 512 GB. Moto G9 Plus shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and a same size aperture, the Moto G9 Plus also counts with a lot bigger camera sensor which provides a way higher image and video quality and a back camera with lot more megapixels.
The Moto G9 Plus has a way better battery life than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 52% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.