Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.5 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-09-07 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.69 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.88 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Blush gold and Navy blue | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a score of 94.6, which is much better than Moto G9 Plus's 80.5 general score. Both phones we compare here have Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has newer 11 version and Moto G9 Plus has Android 10, offering some additional features and some performance improvements. Although Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 and Moto G9 Plus were released only 0 months apart, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 design is incredibly heavier but also noticeably thinner than Moto G9 Plus.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a bit superior CPU than Moto G9 Plus, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has 8 GB more RAM. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with just a bit better screen than Moto G9 Plus, because although it has a little worse pixel density, it also counts with a better resolution of 1768 x 2208 and a little larger screen.
Moto G9 Plus counts with just a bit more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports up to 512 GB. Moto G9 Plus shoots much better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has worse video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same diafragm aperture, the Moto G9 Plus also counts with a bigger back camera sensor taking better quality pictures and videos and a camera in the back with way more megapixels.
The Motorola Moto G9 Plus counts with a little better battery life than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.