Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.6 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-12-05 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.78 x 3.02 x 0.38 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Electric violet and Metallic sage | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1640 x 720 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 263 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 is slightly better than Motorola Moto G9 Power, having a overall score of 80 against 78.6. Even though the Google Pixel 3 is way older than the Motorola Moto G9 Power, it's design is thinner and a lot lighter. The Google Pixel 3 has a much better screen than Motorola Moto G9 Power, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1080 x 2160 pixels and a much greater pixel density.
The Google Pixel 3 counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Moto G9 Power. They have a 4 GB RAM and the same number of cores. Motorola Moto G9 Power has a better camera than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same (Full HD) video quality and the same camera aperture, the Motorola Moto G9 Power also has faster 60 fps video frame rates and a camera in the back with a lot higher 64 mega pixels resolution.
The Motorola Moto G9 Power counts with a superior storage for games and applications than Google Pixel 3, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB and 128 GB internal storage. Moto G9 Power has a really longer battery life than Google Pixel 3, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity against 2915mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.