Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.6 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-12-05 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.78 x 3.02 x 0.38 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Electric violet and Metallic sage | Black, Purple and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 1640 x 720 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 263 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3a has a global score of 78.8, which is a little bit better than Moto G9 Power's overall score of 78.6. Both of these phones have Android OS, but the Google Pixel 3a has 11 version and Moto G9 Power has Android 10, giving you some nice extra features and performance enhancements. Google Pixel 3a's design is noticeably lighter and thinner than Moto G9 Power, even though it was released around 19 months before.
The Google Pixel 3a counts with a sharper screen than Moto G9 Power, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2220px and a way greater screen pixel density. Motorola Moto G9 Power counts with a much better memory capacity to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 128 GB internal storage and a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 512 GB.
The Google Pixel 3a's CPU is very similar to the Moto G9 Power one, both of them have the same RAM amount and the same number of cores. The Motorola Moto G9 Power has a very superior battery performance than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 6000mAh battery size against 3000mAh. The Motorola Moto G9 Power captures much clearer videos and photos than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have the same aperture and the same 1920x1080 video definition, the Motorola Moto G9 Power also has higher video frame rates and a much more MP camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.