Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.6 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-12-05 | 2020-08-20 |
| 6.78 x 3.02 x 0.38 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Electric violet and Metallic sage | Just black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1640 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 263 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a is a little bit better than Motorola Moto G9 Power, with a general score of 82.9 against 78.6. Google Pixel 4a is a thinner and way lighter device than Motorola Moto G9 Power, even though both were released with only 4 months difference. Both phones we compare here work with Android operating system, but the Google Pixel 4a has 11 version and Motorola Moto G9 Power has Android 10 version.
Google Pixel 4a has a bit more powerful CPU than Moto G9 Power, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Google Pixel 4a also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Google Pixel 4a features a much better screen than Moto G9 Power, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a lot better pixel density.
The Moto G9 Power features a superior memory capacity for applications and games than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Moto G9 Power also has a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 512 GB. Motorola Moto G9 Power counts with a superior battery duration than Google Pixel 4a, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity.
Motorola Moto G9 Power shoots better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same video quality, the Motorola Moto G9 Power also counts with better video frame rates and a lot more MP camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.