Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.6 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-12-05 | 2020-11-19 |
| 6.78 x 3.02 x 0.38 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Electric violet and Metallic sage | Clearly white and Just black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1640 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 263 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a 5G is much better than Moto G9 Power, getting an 87.5 score against 78.6. The Google Pixel 4a 5G is a incredibly lighter and somewhat thinner cellphone than the Moto G9 Power, even though both of them were released with only 1 months difference. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but the Google Pixel 4a 5G has a more recent 11 version and Moto G9 Power has Android 10 version.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with a much better screen than Moto G9 Power, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with much more pixels per inch in the screen and a way higher 1080 x 2340px resolution. Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G9 Power, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
Moto G9 Power counts with a lot bigger storage to install games and applications than Google Pixel 4a 5G, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage, the Moto G9 Power also has a SD memory slot that supports up to 512 GB. Motorola Moto G9 Power features a slightly better camera than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for shooting pictures in low light situations, and they both have the same (Full HD) video quality and the same 60 fps video frame rate, the Motorola Moto G9 Power also counts with a back facing camera with a lot better 64 MP resolution.
Motorola Moto G9 Power has a very superior battery life than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity against 3885mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.