Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.6 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-12-05 | 2018-06-01 |
| 6.78 x 3.02 x 0.38 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Electric violet and Metallic sage | Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 170.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1640 x 720 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 263 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G7 ThinQ is a little bit better than Moto G9 Power, having an 81 score against 78.6. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the LG G7 ThinQ has a more recent 9.0 Pie version while Moto G9 Power has Android 10 version. The LG G7 ThinQ construction is somewhat thinner and notably lighter than Moto G9 Power, despite of the fact that it was released many years before.
The LG G7 ThinQ has a bit better hardware performance than Moto G9 Power. They have the same RAM memory amount and the same number of cores. LG G7 ThinQ has a lot better display than Moto G9 Power, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a much greater screen density and a much better 1440 x 3120 pixels resolution.
LG G7 ThinQ counts with slightly more memory for applications and games than Moto G9 Power, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. Moto G9 Power counts with a superior battery life than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has a 100% greater battery capacity.
The Moto G9 Power takes slightly better photographs and videos than LG G7 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for shooting photographs or videos in low-light environments, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video quality and the same 60 fps video frame rates, the Moto G9 Power also counts with a back camera with a way better resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.