Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.6 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-12-05 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.78 x 3.02 x 0.38 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Electric violet and Metallic sage | Black and Gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 1640 x 720 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 263 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ has a general score of 81.3, which is a little bit better than Moto G9 Power's 78.6 overall score. Despite of the fact that LG V35 ThinQ is noticeably older than Moto G9 Power, it's design is much lighter and incredibly thinner. The LG V35 ThinQ has a way better screen than Motorola Moto G9 Power, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a way higher 1440 x 2880px resolution and a much higher screen density.
The LG V35 ThinQ features a little faster processing unit than Motorola Moto G9 Power, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Moto G9 Power features a little bit better camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition, the Moto G9 Power also counts with a lot more mega-pixels camera in the back and faster video frame rates.
LG V35 ThinQ counts with a little bit more memory capacity to install applications and games than Motorola Moto G9 Power, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. Motorola Moto G9 Power counts with a really longer battery life than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has an 82% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.