Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.6 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-12-05 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.78 x 3.02 x 0.38 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Electric violet and Metallic sage | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1640 x 720 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 263 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V40 ThinQ is slightly better than Motorola Moto G9 Power, with an 81.2 score against 78.6. These phones have the same Android 10 OS. Even though the LG V40 ThinQ is a lot older than the Motorola Moto G9 Power, it's design is notably thinner and incredibly lighter. LG V40 ThinQ counts with an incredibly better looking display than Moto G9 Power, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a much higher 1440 x 3120px resolution and way more pixels per display inch.
The LG V40 ThinQ has a bit better hardware performance than Moto G9 Power, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V40 ThinQ also has more RAM memory. The Motorola Moto G9 Power has just a bit better camera than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for taking pictures or video in low-light environments, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same video quality, the Motorola Moto G9 Power also counts with a much more mega pixels camera.
LG V40 ThinQ has a little bit better memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto G9 Power, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. Motorola Moto G9 Power features a very superior battery performance than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.