Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.6 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-12-05 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.78 x 3.02 x 0.38 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Electric violet and Metallic sage | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1640 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 263 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.89 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is better than Motorola Moto G9 Power, having a global score of 87.1 against 78.6. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a much newer cellphone, and it's also thinner and somewhat lighter than the Motorola Moto G9 Power. Both of these devices come with Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has the newer 14 version while Motorola Moto G9 Power has Android 10.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a way better screen than Moto G9 Power, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a lot higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a better display density. Motorola Moto G9 Power features a way better processing power than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has lesser RAM, they both have 8 cores.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with much more storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Moto G9 Power, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity. The Motorola Moto G9 Power has better battery performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra takes much better photographs and videos than Motorola Moto G9 Power, because although it has a camera in the back with a way lower resolution, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture to take better low-light photos and a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.