Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.6 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 13 |
| 2020-12-05 | -- |
| 6.78 x 3.02 x 0.38 inches | -- |
| 7.80 ounces | -- |
| Electric violet and Metallic sage | -- |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1640 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 263 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2600 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | -- |
| 10.89 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A34 is just a bit better than the Moto G9 Power, getting a overall score of 82.9 against 78.6. The Galaxy A34 design is noticeably lighter and incredibly thinner than the Moto G9 Power. Both of these phones have Android OS, but the Galaxy A34 has a newer 13 version and Moto G9 Power has Android 10.
The Samsung Galaxy A34 features a better screen than Motorola Moto G9 Power, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a lot better quantity of pixels per display inch and a much higher 1080 x 2400 resolution. Motorola Moto G9 Power counts with a much better storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A34, because it has more internal storage capacity and a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
Galaxy A34 counts with a bit better processor than Motorola Moto G9 Power. Both of them have a 4 GB RAM and 8 cores. The Moto G9 Power has longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A34, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity. Moto G9 Power counts with a little bit better camera than Galaxy A34, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Moto G9 Power also has a way better 64 megapixels resolution camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.