Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.6 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-12-05 | 2024-03-11 |
| 6.78 x 3.02 x 0.38 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Electric violet and Metallic sage | -- |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1640 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 263 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.89 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G is slightly better than the Motorola Moto G9 Power, having a overall score of 79.4 against 78.6. Both of these devices use Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has the newer 14 version while Motorola Moto G9 Power has Android 10. Samsung Galaxy A35 5G's construction is way newer, just a little lighter and somewhat thinner than the Motorola Moto G9 Power.
Motorola Moto G9 Power has a much better performance than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores. Samsung Galaxy A35 5G counts with a sharper display than Motorola Moto G9 Power, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a lot higher 1080 x 2340 resolution and a greater pixels density.
Galaxy A35 5G takes slightly better videos and photos than Moto G9 Power, because although it has a way less mega-pixels back-facing camera, and they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Galaxy A35 5G also counts with a way higher (4K) video quality. Moto G9 Power counts with a way bigger memory to store more apps and games than Galaxy A35 5G, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Moto G9 Power also has a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 512 GB.
Moto G9 Power has greater battery life than Galaxy A35 5G, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity against 5000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.