Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.6 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-12-05 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.78 x 3.02 x 0.38 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Electric violet and Metallic sage | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1640 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 263 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50 has a general score of 83.8, which is slightly better than Motorola Moto G9 Power's 78.6 overall score. Despite of the fact that Galaxy A50 is older than Motorola Moto G9 Power, it's design is way lighter and notably thinner. Galaxy A50 has a sharper screen than Moto G9 Power, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a way better pixel count per inch in the display.
The Galaxy A50 and Motorola Moto G9 Power have extremely similar memory capacity for apps and games, they have an external SD slot that admits up to 512 GB and exactly the same 128 GB internal memory. The Galaxy A50 features a bit faster processing unit than Motorola Moto G9 Power. They have a 4 GB RAM and the same number of cores.
Moto G9 Power features a superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A50, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity. Moto G9 Power takes just a bit better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for taking photographs or video in low light situations, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition, the Moto G9 Power also counts with a lot more mega pixels back camera and faster video frame rates.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.