Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.6 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-12-05 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.78 x 3.02 x 0.38 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Electric violet and Metallic sage | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1640 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 263 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50s has a global score of 86.6, which is better than the Motorola Moto G9 Power's 78.6 overall score. These phones use the same Android 10 operating system, so both of them should count with very similar operating system features. The Galaxy A50s design is lighter and a lot thinner than the Motorola Moto G9 Power, despite of the fact that it was released about a year before.
The Samsung Galaxy A50s features a more vivid display than Motorola Moto G9 Power, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a way greater screen pixel density and a way better 1080 x 2340 resolution. Galaxy A50s features a little bit better processing power than Motorola Moto G9 Power, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy A50s also has a greater amount of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy A50s counts with just a bit better camera than Moto G9 Power, because although it has a smaller camera aperture and a way less mega-pixels resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality. Galaxy A50s's memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos is just as good as Moto G9 Power's one, they have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity and a SD extension slot that allows up to 512 GB.
Moto G9 Power counts with a really longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because it has a 50 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.