Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.6 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-12-05 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.78 x 3.02 x 0.38 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Electric violet and Metallic sage | Prism cube black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1640 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 263 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 5G is much better than Moto G9 Power, having a overall score of 90.8 against 78.6. The Galaxy A51 5G design is somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner than the Moto G9 Power, even though they were released with only 7 months difference. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but Galaxy A51 5G has the newer 11 version and Moto G9 Power has Android 10 version.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G counts with a sharper screen than Motorola Moto G9 Power, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a much better resolution of 1080 x 2400 and much more pixels per inch in the display. Galaxy A51 5G features a bit bigger memory for games and applications than Moto G9 Power, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A51 5G also has a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 1000 GB.
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G counts with just a bit better processing power than Moto G9 Power, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G also has more RAM memory. Galaxy A51 5G has a bit better camera than Motorola Moto G9 Power, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for shooting pictures or videos in poorly lited situations and a way worse resolution back camera, it also counts with a way higher (4K) video definition.
Moto G9 Power features superior battery life than Galaxy A51 5G, because it has a 33% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.