Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.6 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-12-05 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.78 x 3.02 x 0.38 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Electric violet and Metallic sage | -- |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1640 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 263 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 has an overall score of 90.7, which is better than Moto G9 Power's global score of 78.6. The Samsung Galaxy A52 design is lighter and somewhat thinner than Moto G9 Power, although both were released with only 3 months difference. The Galaxy A52 features a better display than Motorola Moto G9 Power, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a way better resolution of 1080 x 2400 and much more pixels per inch of display.
The Galaxy A52 counts with a little better hardware performance than Moto G9 Power, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A52 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy A52 features a bit bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Moto G9 Power, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory, the Galaxy A52 also has a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 has a better camera than Moto G9 Power, and although they both have a same size aperture and a back camera with a 64 megapixels resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also has a lot better 3840x2160 video definition. The Moto G9 Power counts with superior battery life than Galaxy A52, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.