Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.6 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2020-12-05 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.78 x 3.02 x 0.38 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Electric violet and Metallic sage | -- |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1640 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 263 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a general score of 91.3, which is better than the Moto G9 Power's global score of 78.6. These devices work with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a more recent 12 version while Moto G9 Power has Android 10, providing the user some additional features. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is a thinner and lighter cellphone than Moto G9 Power, even when both of them were released only a couple of months apart.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a better display than Moto G9 Power, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with way more pixels per inch in the display and a much better 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features a slightly better memory for apps and games than Motorola Moto G9 Power, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 1 TB.
Galaxy A52 5G counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Motorola Moto G9 Power, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features a much better camera than Moto G9 Power, and although they both have the same resolution back camera and a F1.8 aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has a much higher video resolution.
Moto G9 Power has greater battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because it has a 6000mAh battery size instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.