Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.6 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-12-05 | 2021-09-01 |
| 6.78 x 3.02 x 0.38 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Electric violet and Metallic sage | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1640 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 263 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52s is better than Motorola Moto G9 Power, getting a 91.1 score against 78.6. These devices come with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy A52s has newer 11 version and Motorola Moto G9 Power has Android 10. Samsung Galaxy A52s is a somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner phone than Motorola Moto G9 Power, although both of them were released only a few months apart.
Samsung Galaxy A52s has just a bit better performance than Moto G9 Power, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy A52s also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Galaxy A52s has a sharper display than Moto G9 Power, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a way greater number of pixels per inch of screen and a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2400.
The Galaxy A52s has a much better camera than Moto G9 Power, and although they both have the same resolution back camera and the same aperture, the Galaxy A52s also has a much better video definition. The Samsung Galaxy A52s features a slightly better memory capacity for games and applications than Moto G9 Power, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy A52s also has a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 1 TB.
The Motorola Moto G9 Power features greater battery life than Samsung Galaxy A52s, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.