Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.6 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-12-05 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.78 x 3.02 x 0.38 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Electric violet and Metallic sage | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 1640 x 720 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 263 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Fold is much better than the Moto G9 Power, having a overall score of 97.6 against 78.6. The Galaxy Fold is an older and heavier device than the Moto G9 Power, but Samsung managed to make it a lot thinner anyway. Both phones in this comparison have Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Fold has a newer 9.0 Pie version while Moto G9 Power has Android 10, offering some extra features.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a brighter display than Moto G9 Power, because it has a much better resolution of 1536 x 2152, a better screen density and a little bit bigger screen. The Galaxy Fold counts with a bit superior processing unit than Moto G9 Power, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Fold also has 8 GB more RAM memory.
The Galaxy Fold has a very superior memory for games and applications than Moto G9 Power, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. Motorola Moto G9 Power captures clearer videos and photos than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not good for capturing pictures or videos in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same video definition and the same 60 frames per second video frame rate, the Motorola Moto G9 Power also counts with a much higher resolution back-facing camera.
Motorola Moto G9 Power counts with a much better battery life than Galaxy Fold, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.