Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.6 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-12-05 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.78 x 3.02 x 0.38 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Electric violet and Metallic sage | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1640 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 263 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 has a general score of 90.8, which is better than the Moto G9 Power's general score of 78.6. The Galaxy Note 20 is a somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner cellphone than Moto G9 Power, although they were released with only 4 months difference. Galaxy Note 20 counts with a brighter display than Moto G9 Power, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a greater quantity of pixels per display inch and a lot better 1080 x 2400 resolution.
Galaxy Note 20 has a bit better processing unit than Motorola Moto G9 Power, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy Note 20 also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Motorola Moto G9 Power has a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 video quality and the same aperture, the Motorola Moto G9 Power also has higher 60 frames per second video frame rate and a way more megapixels back-facing camera.
The Moto G9 Power counts with a superior memory to store more apps and games than Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Moto G9 Power also has an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Motorola Moto G9 Power counts with a much better battery duration than Galaxy Note 20, because it has a 6000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.