Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.6 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-12-05 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.78 x 3.02 x 0.38 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Electric violet and Metallic sage | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1640 x 720 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 263 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a general score of 98.9, which is a lot better than Motorola Moto G9 Power's general score of 78.6. These phones have Android OS, but Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has 13 version and Motorola Moto G9 Power has Android 10 version, providing some nice extra features and optimized performance. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a thinner and a little bit lighter device than Motorola Moto G9 Power, even though both were released only 4 months apart.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a much sharper screen than Moto G9 Power, because it has a quite bigger display, a much better display pixel density and a much higher resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a bit bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Moto G9 Power, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a little faster processor than Motorola Moto G9 Power, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has more RAM memory. Moto G9 Power features superior battery duration than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a lot better camera than Moto G9 Power, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition and a back camera with a much higher 108 mega pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.