Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 78.6 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2020-12-05 | 2013-09-04 |
| 6.78 x 3.02 x 0.38 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Electric violet and Metallic sage | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1640 x 720 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 263 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 7.52 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 3 is just a bit better than Moto G9 Power, with an 81.2 score against 78.6. Both phones in our current comparison come with Android operating system, but Galaxy Note 3 has an older 5.0 version and Moto G9 Power has Android 10. Even though Galaxy Note 3 is a lot older than Moto G9 Power, it's body is somewhat thinner and lighter.
The Galaxy Note 3 features a little better processing power than Motorola Moto G9 Power, because although it has a lower number of cores (although faster) and a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a graphics processing unit. The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 counts with an incredibly better display than Moto G9 Power, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixel number in each inch of display and a higher resolution of 1920 x 1080px.
Motorola Moto G9 Power shoots much better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 video resolution, the Motorola Moto G9 Power also has a much better resolution back facing camera, higher 60 fps video frame rate and a bigger aperture to capture better photography and videos in poorly lited environments.
The Motorola Moto G9 Power features a much better storage to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because it has a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 512 GB and more internal storage. The Moto G9 Power has a much better battery performance than Galaxy Note 3, because it has a 6000mAh battery size against 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.