Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.6 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-12-05 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.78 x 3.02 x 0.38 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Electric violet and Metallic sage | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1640 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 263 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.89 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note Fan Edition is a bit better than the Motorola Moto G9 Power, getting an 80.4 score against 78.6. Although the Galaxy Note Fan Edition is incredibly older than Motorola Moto G9 Power, it's design is extremely lighter and somewhat thinner. Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a more vivid display than Moto G9 Power, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a lot higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a lot more pixels per inch of display.
Galaxy Note Fan Edition features a little faster CPU than Moto G9 Power. They have the same number of cores and a 4 GB RAM. Motorola Moto G9 Power shoots better photos and videos than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution, the Motorola Moto G9 Power also counts with a way more mega-pixels camera in the back and higher video frame rates.
Moto G9 Power has a way bigger storage to install games and applications than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has 128 GB internal storage and an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Moto G9 Power has a superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity against 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.