Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.6 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2020-12-05 | 2013-09-25 |
| 6.78 x 3.02 x 0.38 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Electric violet and Metallic sage | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1640 x 720 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 263 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 330 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto G9 Power is a bit better than Galaxy Note3, with a overall score of 78.6 against 77.7. Both devices we compare here work with Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola Moto G9 Power has older 10 version while Galaxy Note3 has Android 4.4.2. Motorola Moto G9 Power's design is a lot newer, but thicker and incredibly heavier than the Galaxy Note3.
Motorola Moto G9 Power has a little bit better processing power than Galaxy Note3, because it has a larger amount of RAM memory and 4 more CPU cores (although they are slower). The Samsung Galaxy Note3 has a little sharper display than Motorola Moto G9 Power, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1080 x 1920 resolution and a greater pixel number per display inch.
Motorola Moto G9 Power has a very superior memory capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has more internal memory and a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 512 GB. Motorola Moto G9 Power counts with a much better camera than Galaxy Note3, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution, the Motorola Moto G9 Power also has better video frame rates, a back facing camera with way more MP and a larger diafragm aperture for better low-light photos.
Moto G9 Power has a very superior battery duration than Galaxy Note3, because it has a 6000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.