Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.6 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-12-05 | 2016-08-02 |
| 6.78 x 3.02 x 0.38 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Electric violet and Metallic sage | Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1640 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 263 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.89 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note7 has a score of 79.5, which is a little bit better than the Moto G9 Power's 78.6 score. Despite of the fact that the Galaxy Note7 is way older than the Moto G9 Power, it's body is somewhat thinner and notably lighter. Moto G9 Power features a bit better processing unit than Galaxy Note7, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Moto G9 Power also has 4 more CPU cores (although slower).
The Galaxy Note7 features a more vivid display than Moto G9 Power, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a lot higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a lot more pixels per inch of display. Moto G9 Power counts with a better camera than Galaxy Note7, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition, the Moto G9 Power also counts with higher 60 fps video frame rates and a back camera with a lot higher resolution.
The Moto G9 Power features a very superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Note7, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. Motorola Moto G9 Power counts with a much longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity against 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.