Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.6 | 83 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-12-05 | 2017-09-15 |
| 6.78 x 3.02 x 0.38 inches | 6.40 x 2.94 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 6.88 ounces |
| Electric violet and Metallic sage | Deep Sea blue, Maple gold, Midnight black and Orchid gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 440.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1640 x 720 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 263 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note8 is a bit better than Moto G9 Power, getting a score of 83 against 78.6. Both devices we compare here use Android operating system, but the Galaxy Note8 has 9.0 Pie version and Moto G9 Power has Android 10 version, so it provides you lots of additional features. Despite of the fact that Galaxy Note8 is much older than Moto G9 Power, it's body is somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter.
The Galaxy Note8 has a way better screen than Moto G9 Power, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a way better resolution of 1440 x 2960px and a lot higher quantity of pixels per inch of display. Moto G9 Power has a much bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Note8, because it has 128 GB internal storage and a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
The Galaxy Note8 features a bit faster processor than Motorola Moto G9 Power, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note8 also has a greater amount of RAM. The Moto G9 Power has a way better battery life than Galaxy Note8, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Moto G9 Power has a superior camera than Galaxy Note8, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same video definition, the Moto G9 Power also counts with higher video frame rate and a way higher resolution back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.