Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.6 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-12-05 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.78 x 3.02 x 0.38 inches | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Electric violet and Metallic sage | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1640 x 720 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 263 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 is much better than the Moto G9 Power, getting an 88.3 score against 78.6. Galaxy S10 is an older phone than the Moto G9 Power, but Samsung was able to build it lighter and somewhat thinner anyway. Both phones we are comparing here have Android operating system, but Galaxy S10 has a newer 11 version while Moto G9 Power has Android 10 version.
Samsung Galaxy S10 features an incredibly better screen than Motorola Moto G9 Power, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a much greater quantity of pixels per inch in the display and a way higher resolution of 1440 x 3040 pixels. Galaxy S10 counts with as much storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos as the Motorola Moto G9 Power one, both have a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 512 GB and the same internal memory.
The Galaxy S10 features a bit better processing power than Motorola Moto G9 Power, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy S10 also has 4 GB more RAM memory. Moto G9 Power shoots just a bit better photos and videos than Galaxy S10, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low light photos and video, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same video resolution, the Moto G9 Power also counts with a camera in the back with lot more MP.
Motorola Moto G9 Power features a really longer battery life than Galaxy S10, because it has a 6000mAh battery size against 3400mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.