Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.6 | 89.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-12-05 | 2020-02-03 |
| 6.78 x 3.02 x 0.38 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Electric violet and Metallic sage | Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| -- | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1640 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 263 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has an overall score of 89.7, which is better than the Motorola Moto G9 Power's general score of 78.6. The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite design is thinner and lighter than the Motorola Moto G9 Power, even though it was released around 10 months before. Galaxy S10 Lite has a little bit better hardware performance than Moto G9 Power, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S10 Lite also has 4 GB more RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has a better looking display than Moto G9 Power, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixels count in each inch of display and a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2400px. The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite captures better photographs and videos than Motorola Moto G9 Power, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not good for taking images and video in poorly lited situations and a lot less mega-pixels back facing camera, it also counts with a way higher video definition.
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite features slightly more storage to store more games and applications than Motorola Moto G9 Power, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite also has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 1000 GB. The Moto G9 Power features better battery duration than Galaxy S10 Lite, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.