Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.6 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-12-05 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.78 x 3.02 x 0.38 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Electric violet and Metallic sage | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1640 x 720 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 263 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 has a score of 94.8, which is a lot better than Moto G9 Power's 78.6 general score. The Samsung Galaxy S20 is an older cellphone than Moto G9 Power, but it is noticeably lighter and thinner anyway. Both of these devices use Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy S20 has the newer 13 version while Moto G9 Power has Android 10, so it counts with some nice extra features and optimized performance.
Samsung Galaxy S20 has a way better looking display than Motorola Moto G9 Power, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a much better resolution of 1440 x 3200px and a way greater pixels amount per screen inch. Samsung Galaxy S20 has a little better processing power than Motorola Moto G9 Power, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy S20 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Motorola Moto G9 Power captures a bit better photos and videos than Galaxy S20, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture and the same video definition, the Motorola Moto G9 Power also has a back facing camera with a lot better resolution and higher 60 frames per second video frame rate.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 has a little bit more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto G9 Power, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy S20 also has a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. Moto G9 Power features a superior battery lifetime than Galaxy S20, because it has a 50 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.