Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.6 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-12-05 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.78 x 3.02 x 0.38 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Electric violet and Metallic sage | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1640 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 263 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 FE has a general score of 90.8, which is much better than the Moto G9 Power's 78.6 overall score. Both of these phones use Android OS, but Galaxy S20 FE has newer 11 version while Moto G9 Power has Android 10. Galaxy S20 FE's construction is somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter than the Moto G9 Power, even when both were released only 2 months apart.
Galaxy S20 FE counts with a much better display than Motorola Moto G9 Power, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a much better 1080 x 2400px resolution and much more pixels per inch in the screen. The Galaxy S20 FE has a bit better processing unit than Motorola Moto G9 Power, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy S20 FE also has more RAM memory.
Moto G9 Power counts with a slightly better camera than Galaxy S20 FE, and although they both have a same size aperture, the same 60 frames per second video frame rates and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality, the Moto G9 Power also has a camera in the back with a much higher resolution. The Galaxy S20 FE counts with a slightly bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Moto G9 Power, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Galaxy S20 FE also has a SD extension slot that holds up to 1000 GB.
The Moto G9 Power features improved battery performance than Galaxy S20 FE, because it has a 33 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.