Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.6 | 93.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2020-12-05 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.78 x 3.02 x 0.38 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Electric violet and Metallic sage | Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1640 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 263 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Multi-touch |
| 7.2 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S22 is better than the Moto G9 Power, getting a 93.4 score against 78.6. Both phones in this comparison review work with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy S22 has the newer 13 version while Moto G9 Power has Android 10, counting with some additional features. The Samsung Galaxy S22 design is newer, incredibly lighter and incredibly thinner than Moto G9 Power.
The Galaxy S22 has a much better looking screen than Moto G9 Power, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a lot better display pixels density and a lot higher 1080 x 2340 resolution. The Galaxy S22 features just a little better processing power than Moto G9 Power, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S22 also has 4 GB more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy S22 shoots much clearer videos and photos than Motorola Moto G9 Power, because although it has a lot less megapixels resolution back camera, and they both have a same size camera aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S22 also counts with a lot better 7680x4320 video resolution. The Motorola Moto G9 Power features much more memory for games and applications than Galaxy S22, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Motorola Moto G9 Power also has a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
The Motorola Moto G9 Power has a very superior battery life than Galaxy S22, because it has a 6000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.