Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.6 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2020-12-05 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.78 x 3.02 x 0.38 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Electric violet and Metallic sage | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1640 x 720 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 263 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a global score of 95.4, which is a lot better than Moto G9 Power's overall score of 78.6. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra construction is newer and a little bit thinner, but also just a bit heavier than Moto G9 Power. Both of these phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has newer 13 version while Moto G9 Power has Android 10 version, so it offers some additional features and enhanced performance.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a way better looking screen than Motorola Moto G9 Power, and although they both have a same size screen, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a much higher pixel density and a much higher resolution of 1440 x 3088. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a little bit better hardware performance than Moto G9 Power, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra captures much clearer pictures and videos than Moto G9 Power, and although they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a much more MP camera in the back and a much better 7680x4320 video quality. The Moto G9 Power has a very superior memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S22 Ultra, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Moto G9 Power also has an external memory slot that holds up to 512 GB.
Motorola Moto G9 Power counts with greater battery performance than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because it has a 20 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.