Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.6 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-12-05 | -- |
| 6.78 x 3.02 x 0.38 inches | -- |
| 7.80 ounces | -- |
| Electric violet and Metallic sage | -- |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1640 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 263 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S25 has an overall score of 82.6, which is just a bit better than the Moto G9 Power's general score of 78.6. The Samsung Galaxy S25 is a incredibly thinner and much lighter cellphone than the Moto G9 Power. Both of these phones come with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy S25 has the newer 14 version while Moto G9 Power has Android 10 version.
Samsung Galaxy S25 has a much more vibrant screen than Motorola Moto G9 Power, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a lot greater pixels density and a way higher 1080 x 2340 resolution. The Moto G9 Power has a much better performing processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S25, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cores.
The Galaxy S25 captures better videos and photos than Moto G9 Power, because although it has a camera in the back with a way worse 50 mega-pixels resolution, and they both have the same camera aperture, the Galaxy S25 also counts with a lot higher video definition. Moto G9 Power features a lot bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S25, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Moto G9 Power also has an external SD slot that allows up to 512 GB.
The Moto G9 Power features a really longer battery performance than Galaxy S25, because it has a 50 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.