Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.6 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2020-12-05 | 2014-06-23 |
| 6.78 x 3.02 x 0.38 inches | 5.59 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Electric violet and Metallic sage | Black, Blue, Gold and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1640 x 720 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 263 pixels per inch | 432 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.2 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 2.10 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.89 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time |
| 7.52 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Moto G9 Power is just a bit better than Galaxy S5 Plus, with a 78.6 score against 78.1. Both devices in our current comparison include Android operating system, but the Moto G9 Power has the previous 10 version and Galaxy S5 Plus has Android 4.4.2. The Moto G9 Power design is newer than Galaxy S5 Plus's, but it's thicker and notably heavier.
The Samsung Galaxy S5 Plus features an incredibly better screen than Motorola Moto G9 Power, because although it has a way smaller display, it also counts with a lot greater count of pixels per inch of screen and a better resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels. Galaxy S5 Plus has just a bit better processing power than Motorola Moto G9 Power, because although it has an inferior number of cores and a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a graphics processor.
Motorola Moto G9 Power shoots much clearer videos and photos than Galaxy S5 Plus, and although they both have the same video resolution, the Motorola Moto G9 Power also has higher 60 fps video frame rates, a larger aperture to take better low-light images and a way higher 64 megapixels resolution camera.
Moto G9 Power counts with a much better memory capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy S5 Plus, because it has a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 512 GB and more internal storage capacity. The Motorola Moto G9 Power has a way better battery lifetime than Galaxy S5 Plus, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.