Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.6 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2020-12-05 | 2014-06-23 |
| 6.78 x 3.02 x 0.38 inches | 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Electric violet and Metallic sage | Blue and Red |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1640 x 720 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 263 pixels per inch | 432 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.2 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.89 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | SIM |
| 6.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time |
| 7.52 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Moto G9 Power is a bit better than Galaxy S5 Sport, with a score of 78.6 against 77.8. The Moto G9 Power is a incredibly newer phone than Galaxy S5 Sport, but it's just a little bit thicker and noticeably heavier. Both phones in our current comparison come with Android operating system, but the Moto G9 Power has an older 10 version while Galaxy S5 Sport has Android 4.4.2 version.
Galaxy S5 Sport counts with a little better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G9 Power, because although it has a lower number of cores and lesser RAM memory, it also counts with an additional graphics processor. The Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport has a much more vibrant screen than Motorola Moto G9 Power, because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1920 x 1080 resolution and a way greater quantity of pixels per inch of screen.
Moto G9 Power features a very superior memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Moto G9 Power features a way better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a 114 percent more battery size.
The Moto G9 Power shoots much better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 video quality, the Moto G9 Power also has a back-facing camera with a much higher resolution, faster video frame rate and a larger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.