Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.6 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-12-05 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.78 x 3.02 x 0.38 inches | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Electric violet and Metallic sage | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1640 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 263 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S7 is a bit better than Moto G9 Power, getting a 79.5 score against 78.6. Samsung Galaxy S7 is an way older cellphone than Moto G9 Power, but Samsung could make it a lot lighter and somewhat thinner. Moto G9 Power features a bit superior CPU than Galaxy S7, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the Moto G9 Power also has a greater number of cores.
Samsung Galaxy S7 counts with a lot better looking display than Moto G9 Power, because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with a lot better pixels density and a way better 1440 x 2560 resolution. The Motorola Moto G9 Power has a much bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy S7, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 512 GB and more internal memory.
The Motorola Moto G9 Power counts with a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy S7, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution, the Motorola Moto G9 Power also counts with better video frame rates and a much higher resolution camera in the back.
Moto G9 Power has a really longer battery duration than Galaxy S7, because it has a 100 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.