Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.6 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-12-05 | 2017-08-11 |
| 6.78 x 3.02 x 0.38 inches | 5.99 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Electric violet and Metallic sage | Gold and Gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1640 x 720 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 263 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S8 Active has a global score of 81.9, which is just a bit better than Moto G9 Power's global score of 78.6. Although the Galaxy S8 Active is extremely older and just a little bit thicker than the Moto G9 Power, it's body is still a bit lighter. The Galaxy S8 Active features a bit superior CPU than Moto G9 Power. Both of them have a 4 GB RAM memory and a Octa-Core processor.
The Samsung Galaxy S8 Active counts with a way better looking display than Moto G9 Power, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a much higher 1440 x 2960px resolution and much more pixels per inch of display. Moto G9 Power has a superior camera than Galaxy S8 Active, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition, the Moto G9 Power also counts with a back facing camera with a much better resolution and faster video frame rates.
Moto G9 Power features a much bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S8 Active, because it has 64 GB more internal storage capacity and a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Moto G9 Power counts with a way better battery life than Galaxy S8 Active, because it has a 6000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.