Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.6 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-12-05 | 2018-03-16 |
| 6.78 x 3.02 x 0.38 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Electric violet and Metallic sage | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1640 x 720 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 263 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S9 has an overall score of 83.3, which is slightly better than Motorola Moto G9 Power's score of 78.6. Samsung Galaxy S9 is an a lot older phone than Motorola Moto G9 Power, but Samsung was able to make it way lighter and somewhat thinner anyway. Samsung Galaxy S9 counts with a bit better CPU than Motorola Moto G9 Power. They have 8 cores and the same RAM amount.
The Samsung Galaxy S9 features a much sharper screen than Moto G9 Power, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a way higher quantity of pixels per display inch and a lot better 1440 x 2960px resolution. Moto G9 Power shoots clearer photos and videos than Galaxy S9, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video definition and the same 60 frames per second video frame rate, the Moto G9 Power also counts with a way more megapixels back facing camera.
Moto G9 Power counts with a much greater storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy S9, because it has more internal memory and an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The Motorola Moto G9 Power features a much better battery duration than Galaxy S9, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.