Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.6 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-12-05 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.78 x 3.02 x 0.38 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Electric violet and Metallic sage | Black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1640 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 263 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 10.89 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a general score of 80.1, which is just a bit better than Motorola Moto G9 Power's 78.6 global score. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro design is heavier and much thicker than the Motorola Moto G9 Power. Both devices we are comparing here have Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has 8.0 Oreo version while Motorola Moto G9 Power has Android 10 version, so it offers a couple nice extra features.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a lot better looking display than Motorola Moto G9 Power, because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with a lot higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a much better pixels density. Motorola Moto G9 Power counts with a much better storage for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have an external memory card slot that holds up to 512 GB, the Motorola Moto G9 Power also has 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with just a bit better processing power than Moto G9 Power. They have 8 cpu cores and the same RAM memory amount. The Motorola Moto G9 Power counts with longer battery life than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity. The Motorola Moto G9 Power shoots a lot better photographs and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for taking pictures and/or video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 1920x1080 video resolution, the Motorola Moto G9 Power also counts with a way more MP camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.