Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.6 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-12-05 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.78 x 3.02 x 0.38 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Electric violet and Metallic sage | Black |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1640 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 263 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is a bit better than Moto G9 Power, with a general score of 81 against 78.6. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is an older and just a bit thicker cellphone than Moto G9 Power, but Samsung was able to build it just a little lighter anyway. Both devices we compare here work with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a newer 11 version and Moto G9 Power has Android 10 version, giving lots of additional features.
The Galaxy XCover Pro has just a bit better performance than Moto G9 Power. They have the same RAM amount and the same number of cores. The Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a brighter display than Moto G9 Power, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a way better resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a much higher screen pixel density.
Motorola Moto G9 Power has a lot bigger memory for apps and games than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 512 GB, the Motorola Moto G9 Power also has 128 GB internal storage capacity. Moto G9 Power captures better videos and photos than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low-light photography, and they both have the same video resolution, the Moto G9 Power also counts with a lot higher resolution camera and better video frame rate.
Motorola Moto G9 Power counts with a much better battery lifetime than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 48% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.