Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.6 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-12-05 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.78 x 3.02 x 0.38 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Electric violet and Metallic sage | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1640 x 720 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 263 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip has a general score of 88.5, which is better than Motorola Moto G9 Power's 78.6 score. These phones use Android OS, but Galaxy Z Flip has newer 12 version while Motorola Moto G9 Power has Android 10, so it counts with a lot of extra features and performance improvements. Galaxy Z Flip is an older phone than the Motorola Moto G9 Power, but Samsung made it lighter and much thinner.
Galaxy Z Flip has a much better looking display than Motorola Moto G9 Power, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a much higher 1080 x 2636 resolution and a lot higher screen pixel density. The Motorola Moto G9 Power has a little bit better storage for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 512 GB.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with a little bit better performance than Moto G9 Power, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Motorola Moto G9 Power features a much longer battery performance than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has an 82 percent bigger battery capacity.
Motorola Moto G9 Power captures clearer videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 video resolution, the same 60 fps video frame rates and the same diafragm aperture, the Motorola Moto G9 Power also has a camera in the back with a lot higher 64 megapixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.