Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.6 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-12-05 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.78 x 3.02 x 0.38 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Electric violet and Metallic sage | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1640 x 720 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 263 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 5G has an overall score of 92.3, which is much better than the Moto G9 Power's 78.6 score. Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a way thinner and lighter cellphone than the Moto G9 Power, even though they were released with only a couple of months difference. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Z Flip 5G has 11 version while Moto G9 Power has Android 10 version.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G features just a bit better performance than Motorola Moto G9 Power, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a higher amount of RAM. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a sharper screen than Moto G9 Power, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2636 and a lot greater pixel density.
The Moto G9 Power has a little bit more memory to store more apps and games than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The Moto G9 Power features a superior battery duration than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 6000mAh battery size.
Moto G9 Power takes clearer photos and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, and although they both have the same aperture, the same 60 frames per second video frame rates and the same (Full HD) video definition, the Moto G9 Power also has a back facing camera with lot more mega-pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.