Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.6 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-12-05 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.78 x 3.02 x 0.38 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Electric violet and Metallic sage | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 1640 x 720 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 263 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a general score of 94.6, which is a lot better than Motorola Moto G9 Power's 78.6 score. Although the Galaxy Z Fold 2 and Motorola Moto G9 Power were only released with a couple months difference, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 body is incredibly heavier but also extremely thinner than Motorola Moto G9 Power. Both of these devices work with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Z Fold 2 has newer 11 version and Motorola Moto G9 Power has Android 10, giving some nice extra features and performance enhancements.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a bit better performance than Motorola Moto G9 Power, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a more vivid screen than Moto G9 Power, because it has a higher pixels density, a little bigger screen and a way higher resolution of 1768 x 2208px.
The Moto G9 Power has a slightly bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 512 GB. Motorola Moto G9 Power shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 2, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 video quality, a same size diafragm aperture and the same video frame rates, the Motorola Moto G9 Power also has a way higher 64 megapixels resolution back camera.
Motorola Moto G9 Power features improved battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.