Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.6 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-12-05 | 2020-05-05 |
| 6.78 x 3.02 x 0.38 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Electric violet and Metallic sage | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1640 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 263 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is a little bit better than Moto G9 Power, with an 81.1 score against 78.6. Although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro and Moto G9 Power were released only 7 months apart, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is a little lighter and a little thinner. Both of these phones work with the same Android 10 OS, so they should count with the same OS features.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a brighter display than Motorola Moto G9 Power, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px and more pixels per display inch. Motorola Moto G9 Power features a much better storage capacity to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, and although they both have a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB, the Motorola Moto G9 Power also has more internal memory capacity.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with just a little better hardware performance than Moto G9 Power, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a much better camera than Motorola Moto G9 Power, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low light photos and video, and they both have a back-facing camera with a 64 mega-pixels, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also counts with a much better video resolution.
Motorola Moto G9 Power counts with greater battery life than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because it has a 20 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.