Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| -- | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2016-11-11 | 2019-09-20 |
| 5.96 x 2.97 x 0.31 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Black, Green, Purple, Red, White and Yellow |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 699.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 401 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P15 chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 9.18 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3110mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.04 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 11 is better than Moto M, getting an 83.3 score against 71.6. Although the iPhone 11 is way newer than the Moto M, it is heavier and a little thicker. IPhone 11 has a little bit better screen than Moto M, because although it has a bit lower 828 x 1792 resolution and a just a bit worse display pixel density, it also counts with a little larger display.
Moto M counts with a slightly better memory capacity for games and applications than iPhone 11, because although it has just 32 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 128 GB. IPhone 11 has a more powerful CPU than Motorola Moto M, because although it has less CPU cores (although faster), and they both have the same RAM memory amount, the iPhone 11 also counts with a 64-bits processor.
IPhone 11 captures much better photographs and videos than Moto M, because although it has a much worse 12 megapixels resolution camera, it also counts with a lot higher 3840x2160 video resolution and a bigger diafragm aperture to take better images and videos in low-light situations. The iPhone 11 counts with just a little bit longer battery duration than Moto M, because it has a 3110mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.