Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 85.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| -- | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2016-11-11 | 2019-09-20 |
| 5.96 x 2.97 x 0.31 inches | 6.22 x 3.06 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray |
| Metal | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P15 chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 9.18 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3969mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.04 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 11 Pro Max is better than Moto M, getting an 85.3 score against 71.6. The iPhone 11 Pro Max is a notably newer device than Moto M, although it's a little bit thicker and extremely heavier. The Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max has a greater hardware performance than Motorola Moto M, because although it has an inferior number of cores , and they both have a 4 GB RAM memory, the Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max also counts with a 64-bits CPU.
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max has a sharper screen than Moto M, because it has a bigger display, a higher resolution of 1242 x 2688 pixels and a just a bit more pixels per inch of screen. The iPhone 11 Pro Max captures a lot better photos and videos than Moto M, because although it has a much less megapixels resolution back camera, it also counts with a bigger aperture for better photos and videos in low-light situations and a lot higher (4K) video definition.
The Moto M counts with a bit more memory for games and applications than iPhone 11 Pro Max, because although it has just 32 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 128 GB. IPhone 11 Pro Max features greater battery performance than Moto M, because it has a 30% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.