Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 81.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| -- | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2016-11-11 | 2020-04-24 |
| 5.96 x 2.97 x 0.31 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Black, Red and White |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 399.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 401 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P15 chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 9.18 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.04 | 3.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone SE (2020) has a score of 81.5, which is better than Moto M's 71.6 general score. The Apple iPhone SE (2020) is a much newer phone, and it's also a bit lighter and a bit thinner than the Moto M. IPhone SE (2020) features a slightly better display than Moto M, although it has a lot worse resolution of 750 x 1334 pixels, a quite smaller screen and a bit lower amount of pixels per display inch.
Moto M counts with a little bit better storage to store more games and applications than Apple iPhone SE (2020), because although it has only 32 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 128 GB. IPhone SE (2020) features a greater processing power than Motorola Moto M, because although it has a lower number of cores and a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit.
Apple iPhone SE (2020) has a way better camera than Moto M, because although it has a camera in the back with a lot worse resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture to capture better photography in low light situations and a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition. Moto M has a much better battery performance than iPhone SE (2020), because it has a 3050mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.