Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| 2016-11-11 | 2017-11-03 |
| 5.96 x 2.97 x 0.31 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Silver and Space gray |
| Metal | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P15 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.18 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.04 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone X is a lot better than the Moto M, with a global score of 88.1 against 71.6. Apple iPhone X is a newer and a little thinner cellphone than Moto M, but it is a little bit heavier. IPhone X counts with a greater processing power than Motorola Moto M, because although it has a lower number of cores (although they are faster) and 1 GB lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bits CPU.
Apple iPhone X counts with a sharper display than Moto M, because it has a bit greater screen density, a bit larger screen and a little higher 1125 x 2436 resolution. The Apple iPhone X captures much clearer pictures and videos than Moto M, because although it has a way less MP resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture to take better low-light photography and a way better (4K) video quality.
IPhone X counts with much more storage to store more games and applications than Moto M, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 224 GB more internal storage. The Moto M features a little better battery lifetime than Apple iPhone X, because it has 3050mAh of battery capacity against 2716mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.