Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Asus |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2016-11-11 | 2024-03-14 |
| 5.96 x 2.97 x 0.31 inches | 6.45 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 7.90 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Desert Sand, Eternal Black, Misty Grey and Skyline Blue |
| Metal | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P15 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.04 | 7.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra is a little bit better than the Moto M, with a 76.1 score against 71.6. The Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra body is a lot newer than Moto M's, but it is notably heavier and thicker. Moto M features a very superior hardware performance than Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra features a sharper display than Moto M, because although it has a just a little lower pixels density, it also counts with a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a larger display. Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra shoots way better photos and videos than Motorola Moto M, because it has a bigger aperture for better images and videos in low-light situations, a way higher 7680x4320 video definition and a back-facing camera with a way higher resolution.
The Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra has a very superior memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto M, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra has a way better battery duration than Moto M, because it has an 80 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.