Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2016-11-11 | 2019-10-24 |
| 5.96 x 2.97 x 0.31 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P15 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.04 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 XL is better than Moto M, getting a score of 82.9 against 71.6. Even though Google Pixel 4 XL is much newer than Moto M, it is somewhat heavier and a bit thicker. The Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a little better hardware performance than Moto M, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 4 XL also has a higher amount of RAM.
Google Pixel 4 XL has a little bit better screen than Moto M, because it has more pixels per screen inch, a little bit larger screen and a way better resolution of 1440 x 3040. Moto M has a slightly better memory for apps and games than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has just 32 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits up to 128 GB.
The Google Pixel 4 XL counts with better battery duration than Motorola Moto M, because it has a 21% bigger battery capacity. The Google Pixel 4 XL captures much better photographs and videos than Moto M, because although it has a camera in the back with much less megapixels, it also counts with a bigger aperture and a much higher video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.